5 Common myths about using an Employer of Record (EOR)
The confusion around EOR’s
Expanding into global markets is an exciting opportunity, but hiring Globally comes with layers of legal, tax, and HR complexities. Many companies consider using an Employer of Record (EOR) to simplify the process—allowing them to hire in new countries without setting up a legal entity.
Yet, despite the growing popularity of EOR services, misconceptions persist. Some businesses hesitate due to outdated information, myths, or a lack of understanding about how EORs actually works.
In this blog, we’ll debunk five common myths about using an EOR for international hiring—and set the record straight.
Myth #1: EOR is only for small companies or startups
Reality: Businesses of all sizes use EORs—including Fortune 500 companies.
Many people assume that only startups or small businesses use EORs because they lack the resources to set up international entities. While it’s true that EORs provide an affordable, low-risk way for smaller companies to expand globally, they’re not just for startups.
In fact, large multinational corporations (MNCs), enterprises, and even government organizations use EORs to streamline their global hiring and compliance processes.
🔹 Example: A large tech company expanding into Asia may use an EOR to onboard employees while setting up its legal entity in parallel—ensuring compliance while scaling efficiently.
✅ EORs are a strategic tool for businesses of all sizes looking for agility, speed, and risk-free international hiring.
Myth #2: Using an EOR Means losing control over employees
Reality: You still manage your employees—EORs handle only compliance and HR administration. One of the biggest misconceptions is that hiring through an EOR means giving up control over employees. This isn’t true.
When a company hires through an EOR, the EOR becomes the legal employer on paper, meaning they handle:
✔ Payroll processing
✔ Compliance with labor laws
✔ Tax filings & social contributions
However, you (the business) remain in full control of:
✔ Employee work assignments
✔ Day-to-day management
✔ Performance evaluations
✔ Team culture & engagement
🔹 Example: A marketing agency in the UK hires a remote employee in Brazil using an EOR. The company still dictates tasks, deadlines, and work expectations—while the EOR takes care of employment laws, payroll, and benefits.
✅ An EOR doesn’t interfere with how you manage your workforce—it just removes compliance burdens.
Myth #3: EORs are expensive—Setting up an entity is more cost-effective
Reality: Setting up a local entity is often far more expensive and time- consuming than using an EOR.
Many companies assume that setting up their own local entity will save money in the long run. But the reality is, creating and maintaining a legal entity in a foreign country is extremely costly and complex.
Here’s a cost comparison between setting up an entity vs. using an EOR:
🔹 Example: A U.S. company looking to hire in France would need to register a local entity, set up payroll, hire a legal team, and comply with French employment laws. With an EOR, they can start hiring within weeks—at a fraction of the cost.
✅ For businesses that want to scale fast, an EOR is far more cost-effective than setting up an entity—especially for short-term or test-market expansions.
Myth #4: EORs are only for hiring contractors, not full-time employees
Reality: EORs support both full-time employees and contractors—ensuring compliance for all worker types.
Some companies assume that EORs are only useful for managing freelancers or contractors, but this is far from true.
EORs legally employ full-time staff on behalf of a company while ensuring compliance with local labor laws. They also offer flexibility for managing contractors, freelancers, and part-time employees—helping businesses stay compliant regardless of worker classification.
🔹 Example: A software company in Canada hires a full-time developer in India through an EOR, ensuring compliance with Indian employment laws, payroll regulations, and benefits requirements.
✅ EORs help companies hire both full-time and contract workers while avoiding misclassification risks.
Myth #5: EORs are a temporary solution—not a long- term strategy
Reality: Many companies rely on EORs for long-term global hiring and workforce expansion.
Some businesses assume that an EOR is just a short-term fix for hiring in new markets. However, many companies leverage EORs for long-term growth because of the cost savings, compliance security, and scalability they offer.
✔ Long-term hiring: Companies use EORs to build and manage global teams without setting up multiple legal entities.
✔ Market testing: Before committing to a new country, businesses use EORs to assess market potential without risk.
✔ Ongoing compliance support: Labor laws change frequently, and EORs ensure continued compliance, saving businesses from legal trouble.
🔹 Example: A U.S. healthcare company expanding into Latin America uses an EOR to build a permanent team across multiple countries—eliminating the need for multiple legal entities.
✅ EORs are a strategic, long-term solution for businesses that want to scale without administrative overhead and compliance risks.
Why EOR‘s are a smart choice for Global Hiring?
The global workforce landscape is evolving, and businesses that adapt quickly gain a competitive edge. Using an Employer of Record (EOR) allows companies to:
✔ Hire faster without entity registration delays
✔ Reduce legal risks and ensure compliance
✔ Cut down expansion costs while scaling globally
✔ Provide a great employee experience with smooth payroll & benefits
✔ Focus on business growth without the distraction of HR and tax complexities
If your company is looking to hire internationally with speed, compliance, and cost- efficiency, using an EOR is a strategic, long-term solution—not just a workaround.